Ted L asks:
If Parnell makes the bullpen this year (and it’s looking pretty likely) does this hurt his chances of ever becoming a starter? Or do his lacking secondary pitches fit him into the bullpen anyway?
Ted, it’s more the latter than the former. The scouts who saw him in 2008 generally put an overall 45 number on him on the 20-80 scouting scale where 50 is MLB average. Fourty-five is a classic middle reliever number. Parnell’s repertoire – strong fastball, slider with nice movement, and a changeup that’s well behind the other two pitches coupled with so-so command, dictates a bullpen role.
Nate W asks:
The other day Gee and Antonini were used for 1 inning each in a big league
spring game. I assume the two are also working as starters to get ready for
the minor league season. Can you talk a little bit about this dual use and
what purpose it serves. Also you might be able to educate us on how minor
league starters prepare for a season in ways that differ from the big league
starters who seem to be on very defined throwing schedules.
An interesting series of questions. I think the Mets just want to see their young pitchers throw against the best competition available for as long as possible. Moreover, the pitchers (Gee, Antonini) get the benefit of the big league experience (including learning from sage veterans) and coaching, while the MLB coaches get a chance to learn about some of the young talent. It’s a win all around.
As far as getting stretched out for the season so that the pitcher is ready to go on Opening Day, most likely, after throwing in the MLB game, the pitcher would head down to the bullpen to continue throwing.
As you point out, MLB pitchers are put on very defined throwing programs early in the spring with a team’s goal to win as many major league games as possible. However, in the minors, as we talk about a lot, winning takes a back seat to development. In this case, that means that minor league pitchers often break camp with shorter pitch counts – say 75 – than their MLB counterparts.
Joshua M writes:
Next time you answer questions can you discuss Dylan Owen? I
understand that he is an undersized righty, who lacks velocity, but he
has progressed like Gee, Antonini etc. I was surprised that he didn’t
make the top 41 at all. thanks.
First a note about the rankings: Owen just missed. Could he have landed at #41? Absolutely. The gap between the last five guys to make the list and the next five is pretty small.
On the substance, Josh pretty much covered the Dylan Owen question for me. Owen is an undersized righty with a below average MLB fastball. I have trouble coming up with an MLB role for him. Find me a right-handed starter below 6’0” who doesn’t throw 90 and didn’t upon his arrival in the big leagues. Having eliminated starting, the question is whether his breaking ball is the dominant type that would play in short outings as a middle reliever out of the ‘pen. And it just might or it might not. However, I believe that the players ranked ahead of Owen have higher ceilings or better chances to contribute to a first-division team.