<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strike?  Ball?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metsminorleagueblog.com/2009/06/26/strike-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metsminorleagueblog.com/2009/06/26/strike-ball/</link>
	<description>The Premier Blog about the Mets Minor League System</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:29:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmc</title>
		<link>http://www.metsminorleagueblog.com/2009/06/26/strike-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-3704</link>
		<dc:creator>dmc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsminorleagueblog.com/?p=4577#comment-3704</guid>
		<description>I live in New Hampshire, and Boston before that, so I watch a lot of Sox games on NESN (when the Mets aren&#039;t on Fox or ESPN). The angle from straight-away center field is not a bad angle at all, and I didn&#039;t even notice it until I read this article.
It&#039;s not as distracting as it sounds, and would make for more accurate complaints by fans. 
I&#039;ve actually heard the Sox announcers claim that their pitchers got away with a call or two before, and they have the more advantageous camera angle to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in New Hampshire, and Boston before that, so I watch a lot of Sox games on NESN (when the Mets aren&#8217;t on Fox or ESPN). The angle from straight-away center field is not a bad angle at all, and I didn&#8217;t even notice it until I read this article.<br />
It&#8217;s not as distracting as it sounds, and would make for more accurate complaints by fans.<br />
I&#8217;ve actually heard the Sox announcers claim that their pitchers got away with a call or two before, and they have the more advantageous camera angle to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NateW</title>
		<link>http://www.metsminorleagueblog.com/2009/06/26/strike-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-3702</link>
		<dc:creator>NateW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsminorleagueblog.com/?p=4577#comment-3702</guid>
		<description>While the dead-center angle does show the side to side location and movement better than the traditional one, I think anyone who has watched enough baseball has a good grasp of the strikezone while watching from the offset angle.  At least as good a grasp as the umpire behind the plate... 

The traditional offset angle does look better on TV in terms of the spacing.  So why make us learn a new strikezone, and show something that looks worse on TV?  

I do like the use of this angle for replays, and I&#039;m glad that they built Citi with this camera location.  They should make it available in any ballpark where it is feasible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the dead-center angle does show the side to side location and movement better than the traditional one, I think anyone who has watched enough baseball has a good grasp of the strikezone while watching from the offset angle.  At least as good a grasp as the umpire behind the plate&#8230; </p>
<p>The traditional offset angle does look better on TV in terms of the spacing.  So why make us learn a new strikezone, and show something that looks worse on TV?  </p>
<p>I do like the use of this angle for replays, and I&#8217;m glad that they built Citi with this camera location.  They should make it available in any ballpark where it is feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
