post icon

Friday Chat Wrap: Finding a Comp for Tejada

By Toby Hyde on 25. Aug, 2009

Both Baseball Prospectus and Baseball America held chats on Friday with a fair amount of Mets content.  We’ll start with BP, and Kevin Goldstein because it opens up a wider range of issues and no one does it better than KG.

brian (Brooklyn NY): Are you a believer in Josh Thole? He cant be worse than Schneider and Santos, right?

Kevin Goldstein: If that’s your litmus test in me believing in him, then yet. Not a great defender, but can hit. Best comp I’ve heard from a scout is Darrin Fletcher.

I believe that the “yet” should be a “yes,” in a chat-induced typo.  I’ve already posted about Thole yesterday, so we’re not going to go over this again, but he should see some big league action in September.


Carl (Buffalo, NY): When do you see Ruben Tejada making an impact in the majors and what kind of impact do you see him making?

Kevin Goldstein: Ruben Tejada is going to be a big leaguer, but not an impact one. For me, he’s kind of a future Enrique Wilson kind of player.

I thought this answer was a little flip, so I responded:

Toby (www.metsminorleagueblog.com): re: Tejada & Enrique Wilson Don’t you have to acknowledge that Tejada’s hitting .285/.350/.366 at age 19 is more impressive than anything in Wilson’s MiLB track record? Wilson was in the Appy League at 19 and didn’t reach AA until age 22 when he hit .304/.346/.390. I’m not arguing that Tejada will be a star, because he lacks power, but I think you’re a little light on him.

Kevin Goldstein: First off, NOBODY covers the Mets system in depth as well as Toby. Second, I think you are taking the comp far too literally. I’m saying Tejada is the kind of guy who could be an occasional starter, mostly utility guys who last for around a decade, that’s all.

tejada-b-mets-leg-kick-cropped

I get where Goldstein is going: Tejada’s going to be a big leaguer, but never an impact guy, but I think that’s Tejada’s low-end outcome given what he’s down at AA at his age going .282/.346/.363 in 122 games with 33 walks and 55 strikeouts in 443 AB.

Wilson played more than 100 games in a MLB season once, when played 113 games for Cleveland in 1999 at age 25 where he hit .262/.310/.352 .  But lets move away from Enrique Wilson, to find a better comp for Tejada.

How does Tejada compare to the Mets current utility middle-infield type, Anderson Hernandez?  Hernandez spent his age-19 season in the FSL where he hit .259/.310/.339 for Lakeland, striking out 102 times and walking 33 times in 410 AB over 123 G in 2002.  He didn’t reach reach AA until his age 21 season, two years older than Tejada, when he hit .274/.326/.376 in 101 games for Erie with 89 K and 26 walks.   The thing distinguishing Hernandez and Tejada at the plate is Tejada’s superior batting eye and many fewer strikeouts.  In 2008, in the the FSL, Tejada fanned just 77 times in 131 games and earned 41 walks in 497 AB in 131 games.  At a younger age, he was swinging and missing far less ofter than Hernandez, while walking more.  So, Tejada has been better than Hernandez at the same level at a younger age.

On Tejada’s PECOTA projections page at Prospectus, his second-best comp is Joaquin Arias, the player to be named later in the Yankees-Rangers trade of Alfonso Soriano for Alex Rodriguez. I know Arias’s game well, he was with the Stockton Ports in 2004, when I broadcast for the team.  In 2004, at age 19, Arias hit .300/.344/.396 in 500 AB over 123 games  with just 53 strikeouts against 31 walks.  That year, Arias engaged in a one-man crusade against the idea that there was no such thing as clutch hitting, when he hit something like .500 with the bases loaded, and had a big day on the penultimate day of the season going 2-2 with a double, a homer and 5 RBI to reach the .300 plateau before leaving the game, but we digress.  He was more physical than Tejada but moved more mechanically to Tejada’s fluididity.  In any case, Arias’s advanced-A numbers at age 19, look a lot like Tejada’s AA numbers at age 19  even down to the same number of doubles (19 for Arias and 20 for Tejada).  The problem with the comparison is that when Arias moved up to AA Frisco at age 20 in 2005, he walked roughly never in a .315/.335/.423 season with 17 walks against 46 K in 499 AB over 120 games.  He would never walk 30 times in a season again.  So, again, the problem is that Arias didn’t walk as much as Tejada and was a year older, by the time he hit AA.

If Mets fans want to think wildly optimistically, how about Asdrubal Cabrera? A gifted defensive shortstop in the Mariners chain, Cabrera rose rapidly through the upper minors age 19 and then bounced around for two years before establishing himself as a regular at 22 and blossoming into a borderline star at age 23 in 2009.  At age 19, Cabrera began the year in the Midwest Leage where he hit .318/.407/.474 in 51 games, showing fine plate discipline with 30 walks and 32 K.  Promoted to the advanced-A California League, Cabrera hit .284/.325/.418 with 15 walks and 47 K in 225 AB over 55 games.  The Mariners moved him up to AAA Tacoma to finish that season and had him begin the 2006 season at the same level at age 20 where he hit .236/.323/.360 with 24 BB and 51 K in 203 AB over 60 games.  After the Indians stole him for Eduardo Perez, they assigned him to their AAA affiliate in Buffalo where he didn’t hit much.

However, give the Indians credit.  In 2007, they sent the 22 year old Cabrera back down to AA where he exploded for 8 HR as part of a .310/.383/.454 line in 96 games with Akron.  He finished up with 45 games in the big leagues at age 21 hitting a solid .283/.354/.421.  Cabrera held his own in the bigsas a 22-year old last year hitting .259/.346/.366 before becoming one of baseball’s better hitting middle infielders at .313/.363/.447 in 2009.  One of the differences between his 08 and his 09 was his BABIP which rose from .316 to .374 with a more modest uptick in his linedrive rate from 20.9% to 22.2%.

By the way, according to minorleaguesplits.com, Tejada has increased his LD% every year, reaching 14% this year.

Or for another wildly optimistic comp, how about Robinson Cano, who hit .280/.341/.366 in his first exposure to AA at age 20.  I’ll throw this out as non-sensical.  Cano had already shown real game power by belting 14 HR in the SAL at age 19.

On the less whimsical side Jose Lopez, who owns a  1.5 WAR in ’09, played in AA at age 19 as well, hitting .258/.303/.403 for AA San Antonio in ’03.  In 538 AB, Lopez didn’t strike out much (56 whiffs) and rarely walked (27).

So, where does this leave Tejada?  Pretty much where we started.  His plate discipline is very unusual for a player of his age at AA: no other player in our brief look at middle infielders at AA walked as much as Tejada.  However, because his power is so minimal, he will need to maintain that discipline.  Moreover, as we’ve seen in these few examples, power really does develop later than other skills.

He’s looking like a big leaguer, but his ultimate value is a wide open question.  He’s performed better at a younger age than some players who have been among the better offensive second basemen this year, while sharing similarities with guys like Arias who have never held a big league job.  On the positive end, Tejada hold up well in comparison to Asdrubal Cabrera.   Even in Cabrera’s case, he needed nearly two full years in the upper minors at age 20 and 21, before realizing value in the big leagues.

So use this as a note of caution on Tejada’s timetable as well.  Let him go to the AFL this year.  Let him start 2010 in AAA.  His own performance and development will indicate much more fully what he can become.  I’m also looking forward to what PECOTA and the other projection systems come up with for Tejada this winter.


fjm(anuel) (ny): Speaking of the tough life of a first base prospect, can Ike Davis hit enough to be a mid-order big league hitter?

Kevin Goldstein: I think it’s borderline. He’s definitely looking good of late, but future stud? Not so sure.

brian (brooklyn): Is Kirk Nieuwenhuis any kind of a prospect?

Kevin Goldstein: Capt. Kirk (he’s a Met for those not familiar) is one of the hottest hitters in the Florida State League, and yes, he’s at least some kind of prospect.

More Nieu-y from BA:

baseball-america-logo.jpgFrom JJ Cooper at Baseball America:

    Lance (Memphis): With his strong finish to the season and his combination of power and speed, Nieuwenhuis seems to be making a case to be among the Mets top 10 prospects. Where do you think he ranks among Mets prospects?

J.J. Cooper: He’s got to be in the discussion. He’s among the Mets minor league leaders in HRs and SBs and has shown that he could handle skipping low Class A. He just turned 22, so it’s good that he did skip low A from a developmental standpoint. As far as having a combination of speed, power and an ability to hit, Nieuwenhuis ranks among the better Mets prospects. One aside with this. In looking up where Nieuwenhuis ranked in the Mets organization in multiple categories, it jumps out that no one in the Mets system has more than 18 stolen bases this year, which is pretty shocking for the team that always used to have an Esix Snead, Wayne Lydon or Angel Pagan bouncing around.

12 Comments

Leave a comment
  1. big baby
    25. Aug, 2009 at 11:24 am #

    along the lines of his LD% increasing ever year, check out his splits this year http://www.minorleaguesplits.com/cgi-bin/pl.cgi?pl=514913

    9.3, 12.1, 12.4, 16.7, 17.9

    that’s what i’m fucking talking about.

    oh ruben, how do i love thee? let me count the ways

  2. mark4212
    25. Aug, 2009 at 11:45 am #

    Tony this is a great post. I read it yesterday when it was up briefly then it disappeared. I guess you unintentionally posted it before you were ready to.

    Can’t wait to see this seasons review of prospects. Will F-Mart and Neise still qualify, because there is no guarantee they will start the year on the big league club?

    • mark4212
      25. Aug, 2009 at 11:47 am #

      That’s supposed to be Toby not tony…

    • Toby Hyde
      25. Aug, 2009 at 1:24 pm #

      I thought it was ready, but then I wanted to wait to for a few reasons.
      Anyway, yes, Niese and Martinez will still be eligible as prospects this off-season.

      They each qualifiy not because there is no guarantee they’ll be on the big club but because each would still qualify as a rookie in 2010 having fallen short of the playing time requirements (130 AB or 50 IP) and roster time (45 days pre-Sept. 1). Niese will move up from his #4 ranking last yr. It would be tough for Martinez to move up from #1.

      • mark4212
        25. Aug, 2009 at 1:56 pm #

        Good to hear that Martinez would still be rookie eligible, i didn’t even check to see how many AB’s he got.

        Also:

        Billy Wagner traded to the Red Sox for 2 what the Globe is calling “two mid-range minor league players” to be named later.

        It will be interesting to see who these 2 players are and where they will then rank on the Mets Minor League list.

        • NateW
          25. Aug, 2009 at 3:00 pm #

          I’m pretty sure that the DL time counts and that 2009 is Martinez’s rookie season. Fernando is picking up two thirds of a season of service time, with very little return for a player who didn’t need to be on the 40 man roster until this winter. He would make for a pleasant Sept all up this year had things played out much more appropriately.

          It looks like Niese will barely sneak under 45 days though.

        • Toby Hyde
          25. Aug, 2009 at 3:04 pm #

          DL time not included for Rookie Eligibility but DOES count towards service time.

          Per Cots
          re: Rookie Eligibility:
          A player is a rookie unless, during a previous season or seasons, he has:

          * more than 130 at-bats or 50 innings pitched in the Major Leagues, or
          * more than 45 days on a Major League active roster during the 25-man limit period (April-August), excluding time on the disabled list.

          Service Time
          A player earns Major League service time for each day he spends on the active (25-man) roster or on the Major League 15-day or 60-day disabled lists. A player also continues to earn service time while serving any disciplinary suspension or serving in the military.

        • NateW
          25. Aug, 2009 at 3:38 pm #

          Well that’s better. When did they change that? I recall it costing players rookie years in the past.

        • Toby Hyde
          25. Aug, 2009 at 3:50 pm #

          No idea. Both of those are things that are collectively bargained, though.

  3. sam l
    25. Aug, 2009 at 2:04 pm #

    Billy Wagner is a red sock for two PTBNL. Buster Olney reports they are 2 mid not top prospects. Maybe i am overly optomistic but I could see at least one of Luis Exposito and Stephen Fife. Ranked 16th and 17th respectively in the Sox prospects list. Both look like decent big league ballplayers which is a testament to the depth of the Red Sox farm system.

    • mark4212
      25. Aug, 2009 at 2:06 pm #

      Sam that’s what i’m thinking. Burt Hubbach is saying they are both AA ball players. I’m thinking someone who’s young for his age at AA and has a nice ceiling, kind of Ruben Tejada esque who was ranked on this site very mid-range at 19.

  4. Itsdawolverine63
    26. Aug, 2009 at 6:01 am #

    Could you compare Ruben Tejada to Luis Castillo? Someone with great plate discipline, not much power and pretty good defensively?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.