Yesterday, I asked what you wanted me to write about. So today, I’ll answer some questions.
Sandygetsabminussofar asks:
Oakland recently dfa’d powell+miller, as a result of the gonzalez+cahill trades…any chance that the mets are interested in some cheap younger players with professional experience (rather than foolishly giving up something significant for a seth smith)? Also, with the understanding that every GM values every player differently, now that we have seen what gonzalez+latos got back for their teams, if niese could even come close to that, how can the mets not pull the trigger, if they are offered similar value?
The DFAs
We’ll answer the first part of the question first. B-minus is referring to catcher Landon Powell and outfielder Jai Miller from the A’s. Both players would be reasonable fits for the Mets on a minor league contract. The Mets currently have 40 players on their 40-man roster, and I don’t see them dropping anyone for either player.
In addition to Josh Thole and Mike Nickeas, who are on the 40-man, the Mets will bring a cast of thousands (or at least three) of Lucas May, Vinny Rottino and now Rob Johnson to spring training competing to be a backup catcher with the losers enjoying the sights and sounds of Buffalo and the Eastern League. Johnson lest you forget is a career .197/.275/.297 hitter. Ben Lindbergh skewers the Johnson, who also performs poorly in BP’s catcher receiving and framing metrics, noting that, “any exposure to Johnson can be hazardous.” Powell will be 30 in 2012 and has hit a whopping .207/.284/.328 in 406 MLB PA. He’s listed at 6’3″ 265, and has always been, ahem, big, which has limited his agility behind the plate and his defensive ability. Again, just not worth a 40-man roster spot at this point.
Miller, a natural centerfielder, who can play all three outfield positions, is a little more interesting. He’ll be 27 in 2012, and has bopped .271/.351/.516 over parts of four triple-A seasons. He’s walked in a healthy 9% of his plate appearances, but with 550 strikeouts in 423 games, has whiffed in 27.5% of his AAA plate appearances. MLB pitchers have exploited these hacktastic tendencies to hold him to a .235/.288/.368 line, but that’s just 73 PA. He’s probably on his way to becoming a AAA legend, Valentino Pascucci-style.
The Niese Comps
Yes, if Niese could produce a return similar to either Mat Latos or Gio Gonzalez, of course, the Mets would be interested in trading him. Here’s the thing: the other two pitchers are better than Niese.
Lets compare:
……………………2010-11 WAR 2010-11 ERA+ (weighted by IP)
Niese 4.6 89
Latos 7.2 113
Gonzalez 6.7 128
You can argue whether you’d prefer Latos or Gonzalez, but Niese is clearly the third-best pitcher of the trio, and its a fairly significant gap. Dave Cameron also argues here that Gonzalez, if he can cut his walk rate, offers even more upside as well, but expecting a drop in his walk rate is a stretch.
Tug wants to know:
A follow up to SandyB-, what’s your take on the prospect quality the Nats gave up for Gio? Can you suggest what a comparable package from the Mets might have been? Not in favor of making such a trade, but curious. thanks.
The A’s received four players, RHP A.J. Cole, RHP Brad Peacock, C-r Derek Norris and LHP Tom Milone.
At BP, Kevin Goldstein praised the return the A’s received as lacking “one elite prospect, [but] they received a trio of four-star level players and a usable extra arm.”
The Mets don’t have a catcher of the caliber of Norris. Lets get that out of the way. He’s a patient and powerful catcher, who’s produced at AA.
Cole is a high-upside a-ball arm, Peacock is a likely mid-rotation piece and Milone could be a swing-man.
The Mets equivalent package is something like Matt Harvey or Jeurys Familia, Zack Wheeler, Cesear Puello and then Darin Gorski or Collin McHugh. Frankly, I think the Nationals package is better.